Anthropic’s rise to become Silicon Valley’s most valuable artificial intelligence company marks a dramatic turning point in the AI race and signals a broader shift in how investors are beginning to evaluate the future of the industry.
For nearly two years, OpenAI appeared firmly positioned as the dominant force in generative artificial intelligence after ChatGPT ignited a global AI boom in late 2022.
The company became synonymous with the technology itself, attracting unprecedented capital, partnerships, and consumer adoption.
But Anthropic’s latest valuation leap suggests investors are increasingly questioning whether the long-term winners in AI will necessarily be the companies with the largest consumer audiences, or instead those building the most indispensable enterprise infrastructure and coding tools.
Anthropic announced a $65 billion Series H financing round on Thursday that valued the company at $965 billion, overtaking OpenAI’s most recent valuation of $852 billion from March.
The latest round was led by Altimeter Capital, Dragoneer, Greenoaks, and Sequoia Capital and nearly tripled Anthropic’s valuation from February, when it was worth $380 billion.
The financing also includes $15 billion in previously committed investments, including $5 billion from Amazon.
The speed of Anthropic’s rise has stunned even seasoned Silicon Valley investors.
Just 62 days ago, OpenAI announced a record-breaking $122 billion funding round that valued the company at $730 billion — a milestone it had taken roughly a decade to achieve since its founding in 2015.
Anthropic, founded only in 2021, has now surpassed that figure in roughly half the time.
The shift reflects not only surging investor enthusiasm for artificial intelligence, but also a growing belief that Anthropic’s strategy may be better aligned with the next phase of AI adoption.
Anthropic’s rise from outsider to frontrunner
Anthropic was founded by former OpenAI executives Dario and Daniela Amodei after disagreements with OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman over how quickly increasingly powerful AI systems should be commercialized.
Dario Amodei, a biophysicist raised in San Francisco, played a major role at OpenAI in developing the scaling-law research that helped trigger the modern AI boom.
Daniela Amodei, meanwhile, oversaw safety policy initiatives at the company.
But as OpenAI accelerated product releases, the siblings became increasingly concerned that the company was prioritizing speed over caution and adequate testing.
The split would eventually define Anthropic’s identity.
Early on, Anthropic faced significant skepticism from investors.
The company’s close association with the effective altruism movement and links to disgraced cryptocurrency executive Sam Bankman-Fried made many mainstream investors wary at a time when OpenAI was rapidly becoming Silicon Valley’s clear AI champion.
Anthropic also took a more restrained approach to product releases.
In 2022, the company reportedly decided not to release an early version of its Claude chatbot after internal objections from employees who feared it could intensify a dangerous AI arms race.
While OpenAI surged ahead with ChatGPT, Anthropic remained relatively niche and focused largely on enterprise customers and AI safety research.
That slower and more disciplined strategy, however, ultimately pushed the company into one of the most lucrative areas of the AI economy: coding and enterprise automation.
Claude Code changes the trajectory
Anthropic’s growth accelerated sharply in late 2025 following the release of Claude Opus 4.5, a model whose coding abilities rapidly turned Claude Code into one of the most popular developer tools in Silicon Valley.
The product became something of a cultural phenomenon among software engineers and AI enthusiasts, many of whom described themselves online as “Claude-pilled” as they integrated the system deeply into programming workflows.
The surge in adoption translated directly into revenue growth.
Anthropic said Thursday its annualized revenue run rate had climbed to $47 billion, up from $30 billion earlier this year and roughly $10 billion in annual revenue last year.
That growth trajectory now appears to be outpacing OpenAI’s.
OpenAI implied in March that its annualized revenue run rate stood around $24 billion, though The Information reported this week that the figure has since risen to just above $30 billion.
Anthropic’s growth accelerated even further following the launch of Cowork in January, an agentic AI product designed to automate nontechnical workplace tasks.
Unlike traditional chatbot systems, agentic AI products can execute sequences of tasks autonomously, creating substantially higher levels of engagement and usage inside companies.
Anthropic also unveiled Claude Mythos Preview this week, an advanced cybersecurity-focused AI system capable of identifying hidden software vulnerabilities.
The company has restricted access to the model to a select group of firms.
The rapid success of Claude Code has already had consequences far beyond Anthropic itself.
Earlier this year, fears that AI coding systems could undermine large parts of the traditional software industry contributed to a roughly $1 trillion sell-off across technology stocks.
Anthropic later intensified those concerns when it announced Claude could modernize aging COBOL-based legacy systems, triggering IBM’s steepest single-day stock decline in 25 years.
Enterprise adoption shifts toward Anthropic
Anthropic’s momentum is increasingly becoming visible in enterprise adoption metrics as well.
According to data from Ramp, a provider of corporate expense and billing software, Anthropic overtook OpenAI among business users in April.
Ramp said Anthropic adoption rose 3.8% to 34.4% of businesses, while OpenAI adoption fell 2.9% to 32.3%.
“We’ve seen time and time again in this market that a large dominant player can be unseated in a matter of a couple months,” said Ara Kharazian, lead economist at Ramp’s economics lab.
“Anthropic has just done that,” he added.
Anthropic has also steadily gained market share on OpenRouter, a platform allowing customers to dynamically switch between AI models depending on task requirements.
The company’s strength among developers appears to be becoming a major competitive advantage.
OpenAI has disputed some enterprise-adoption comparisons, arguing that metrics based on corporate credit-card spending fail to fully capture large enterprise contracts negotiated directly with companies.
Still, Anthropic’s rise has already triggered strategic recalibration inside OpenAI.
OpenAI pivots toward coding and infrastructure
Facing growing pressure from Anthropic, OpenAI has increasingly narrowed its focus toward coding and enterprise AI.
The company in March agreed to acquire AI coding startup Astral, seeking to compete more aggressively in software-development tools.
Reports have also indicated OpenAI has scaled back several side projects, including experimental e-commerce features and some consumer-focused initiatives, in favor of prioritizing enterprise software and coding applications.
Executives reportedly described Anthropic’s success in coding as a “wake-up call.”
The company’s shifting strategy reflects broader concerns inside OpenAI that it may have spread itself too thin while attempting to operate what Altman once described as a “portfolio of startups” under a single organization.
At the same time, OpenAI is pursuing a dramatically more ambitious infrastructure strategy than Anthropic.
Altman has committed approximately $1.4 trillion over the next eight years toward AI infrastructure projects, including Stargate, a massive network of data centers designed to provide OpenAI greater control over the compute resources powering artificial intelligence.
The strategy effectively amounts to a bet that the future AI economy will be controlled by companies that own the underlying infrastructure rather than simply the applications built on top of it.
But the scale of that commitment is also raising concerns among investors.
OpenAI’s infrastructure ambitions are enormous relative to its current revenue base, creating pressure for adoption and monetization to continue accelerating fast enough to justify the spending before technological change potentially renders parts of the infrastructure obsolete.
Anthropic bets on monetization discipline
Anthropic, meanwhile, is increasingly positioning itself as the more disciplined operator in the AI race.
Chief executive Dario Amodei has repeatedly warned about what he describes as a “cone of uncertainty” surrounding AI infrastructure demand.
Because data centers take years to build, companies are currently making enormous investment decisions based on demand projections that may ultimately prove inaccurate.
“If you’re off by a couple years, that can be ruinous,” Amodei said earlier this year.
Anthropic’s response has been to move aggressively toward per-token pricing models that tie customer spending more directly to actual usage.
That shift reflects growing concerns across the industry that AI demand metrics may be becoming distorted.
As companies deploy more agentic AI systems capable of running autonomous workflows, token consumption can rise exponentially.
Some executives increasingly worry that businesses are measuring AI adoption through sheer usage volume rather than meaningful business outcomes.
Databricks chief executive Ali Ghodsi recently warned that companies could artificially inflate token consumption simply by repeatedly resubmitting prompts or running inefficient loops.
“If your goal is to just burn a lot of money, there are easy ways to do that,” Ghodsi said.
Anthropic’s stricter monetization approach could ultimately provide investors with cleaner visibility into genuine demand as the company approaches a public listing.
The company has already moved away from older flat-rate enterprise pricing models toward contracts that charge customers based on actual token usage.
OpenAI has also started signaling a similar shift.
Nick Turley, OpenAI’s head of ChatGPT, recently acknowledged that unlimited AI pricing models may ultimately prove unsustainable as agentic AI dramatically increases compute consumption.
AI race has not been decided
Anthropic’s leap over OpenAI in valuation does not necessarily mean the AI race has been decided.
OpenAI still retains enormous advantages in consumer awareness, partnerships, and infrastructure scale.
The company’s products remain deeply embedded across businesses and consumer applications worldwide.
But Anthropic’s rise reflects a growing investor belief that the next stage of artificial intelligence may be defined less by chatbot popularity and more by which companies become embedded deepest inside enterprise workflows, coding systems, and autonomous agents.
That shift is also reshaping how Wall Street values AI companies ahead of what are expected to be blockbuster IPOs from both firms.
Anthropic’s valuation surge suggests investors increasingly view enterprise monetization, developer adoption, and pricing discipline as more sustainable long-term advantages than rapid consumer expansion alone.
Still, risks remain substantial for both companies.
Anthropic has already been forced to spend billions securing additional computing power, including renting capacity from SpaceX, after outages frustrated users amid surging demand.
The company also remains locked in disputes with the Pentagon over national-security concerns tied to its AI systems.
Meanwhile, enterprises themselves are beginning to scrutinize AI spending more aggressively as token costs rise sharply.
If businesses begin tightening AI budgets, both Anthropic and OpenAI could face pressure on the explosive growth projections currently underpinning their trillion-dollar valuations.
For now, however, Anthropic’s rise has fundamentally changed the balance of power inside Silicon Valley’s most important technological race.
The company that once appeared destined to remain a cautious outsider has now become the industry’s most valuable AI player — and perhaps the clearest symbol of how quickly leadership in artificial intelligence can change.
The post The new AI king: how Anthropic eclipsed OpenAI’s valuation and leapt to $965B appeared first on Invezz
