For the better part of a decade, JPMorgan was one of Tesla’s most reliable institutional bears. Ryan Brinkman, who covered the stock for the bank since 2015, told investors to sell through earnings beats, record highs, and multiple cycles of Wall Street enthusiasm.
His final target of $145, reiterated in April after Tesla’s first-quarter delivery miss, implied roughly 60% downside. Elon Muskreplied to it on X (the former Twitter) with one word: “lol.”
Six weeks later, Brinkman’s replacement published a completely different view. And the number he put on it is not a subtle adjustment.
JPMorgan’s new Tesla analyst upgrades the stock
Rajat Gupta, the JPMorgan analyst who took over Tesla coverage from Brinkman in early May, upgraded Tesla (TSLA) from underweight to neutral on June 5 and raised his price target from $145 to $475, a 227.6% revision, according to Seeking Alpha.
The upgrade came the morning after JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon offered Elon Musk an audience at the bank’s Reagan National Economic Forum to discuss SpaceX‘s planned IPO, according to Bloomberg.
The new target implies approximately 13% upside from Tesla’s closing price of $418.45 the day before the note.
“TSLA is at the forefront of physical AI,” Gupta wrote. “The unique advantage TSLA has, and unmatched at an industrial level scale, is the degree of vertical integration across all the hardware and software products it builds, combined with the efficacy and speed of technology development.”
More Wall Street:
- JPMorgan resets S&P 500 price target for the rest of 2026
- Vanguard challenges the S&P 500 as a one-stop strategy
- Goldman Sachs resets Broadcom stock forecast
“We believe this aspect, while largely known at a high level, is still somewhat under-appreciated and misunderstood, for the sheer starting-point advantage it brings,” he added, according to TipRanks.
Tesla shares fell approximately 6.6% on the day of Dimon’s invitation, despite the upgrade. A neutral rating is not a buy recommendation. It means JPMorgan is no longer telling investors to actively avoid the stock, according to Bloomberg.
The physical AI thesis that replaced the automaker thesis
The core shift in the JPMorgan note is a change in how Tesla is being categorized.
Brinkman’s framework treated Tesla as an automaker and valued it accordingly. Gupta’s framework treats Tesla as a physical AI company entering what he describes as new and largely uncharted total addressable markets, where vertical integration is the decisive advantage, according to TipRanks.
Gupta draws an explicit parallel to Amazon , specifically to Amazon’s Kiva robotics acquisition and the eventual build-out of AWS. The argument is that Tesla’s factories, battery production, and existing vehicle data are a proving ground for Optimus and other humanoid robots that will reduce cost of goods sold in the core automotive business while validating the product at industrial scale.
That creates a flywheel: manufacturing expertise lowers costs for broader deployment; broader deployment generates more data; more data improves the product.
On the revenue side, Gupta’s team forecasts Tesla’s top line could reach approximately $203 billion by 2030, up from an estimated $95 billion this year.
Robotaxi, Optimus, and Full Self-Driving licensing would account for roughly half the total gain. Earnings per share are projected to reach $7.50 by 2030, from an estimated $1.95 in 2026, with Gupta seeing an earnings inflection in 2028 and 50% annual EPS growth through 2030, according to Seeking Alpha.
Clendenin/Getty Images
Tesla risks: why JPMorgan stopped short of a buy rating
Gupta’s note is explicit about the execution risk. Tesla is entering markets where it has no track record of commercial deployment at scale.
Winning regulatory clearances for unsupervised Robotaxis, demonstrating safety at scale, and deploying technologies that are still maturing are all prerequisites for the 2030 revenue projections to hold.
The FSD hardware problem adds another layer of uncertainty. Musk acknowledged earlier this year that approximately 4 million Tesla vehicles would require new computers and cameras to achieve unsupervised Full Self-Driving, walking back years of assurances.
If Robotaxi timelines slip again or Optimus remains a demonstration product rather than a deployable one, the valuation Gupta is assigning becomes very difficult to defend at current prices.
Tesla’s Wall Street consensus tells a similar story. The average analyst price target for 2027 sits at $404, implying modest downside from where the stock trades now. JPMorgan’s $475 target stands well above that consensus, making it one of the more aggressive calls on the stock heading into the second half of 2026, according to TipRanks.
Key context on Rajat Gupta, Ryan Brinkman, and the JPMorgan Tesla coverage transition:
- Rajat Gupta is ranked #540 out of 9,634 Wall Street analysts on TipRanks with a 62% success rate and 16.5% average return per rating since 2019; he covers the automotive sector broadly and had not previously covered Tesla, TipRanks noted.
- Ryan Brinkman had covered Tesla at JPMorgan since 2015 and was one of Wall Street’s most consistently bearish voices on the stock throughout that period; his final note in April 2026 reiterated $145 and advised investors to approach Tesla with “a high degree of caution,” according to Seeking Alpha.
- The upgrade came after JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon offered Elon Musk an audience to discuss SpaceX’s planned IPO at the bank’s Reagan National Economic Forum, Bloomberg reported.
- Gupta estimates roughly 5 million humanoid robots in the United States and 30 million globally by 2040; Tesla’s factory and vehicle infrastructure is central to his cost-down thesis for Optimus commercial deployment, according to TipRanks.
- Tesla also received a second upgrade on the same day from Erste Group, which moved the stock from sell to hold; the dual upgrade day reflects a broader softening of institutional bearishness on the stock, Seeking Alpha confirmed.
What JPMorgan’s Tesla upgrade means for TSLA stock investors
The most significant implication of the move is not the $475 target. It is the removal of institutional cover for the short thesis.
When JPMorgan published underweight ratings with a $145 target, it was providing credible backing for the view that Tesla’s non-automotive businesses were worth little or nothing. That backing is now gone.
Gupta has replaced it with a framework that explicitly prices in Robotaxi revenue, Optimus deployment, and FSD licensing at scale. That does not mean those businesses will materialize on schedule.
But it does mean the debate has shifted. The question is no longer whether the autonomy and robotics optionality should be in the model. It is whether the execution will justify the numbers Gupta has put on it.
For investors holding Tesla, the upgrade removes a persistent headwind. For investors considering the stock at $419, the honest read is that JPMorgan sees a credible long-term case but is not yet confident enough to recommend buying at current prices.
The $475 target implies 13% upside. At a neutral rating, that is not urgency. It is acknowledgment that the bear case defining JPMorgan’s Tesla view for nearly a decade no longer holds.
Related: Elon Musk, Tesla face serious new threat
